Position Statement Development Platform
ARCADE
internAtional neuRocardiology Consensus for Advancing carDiac workup after strokE
Expert Consensus Study — RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
Structured Consensus
Evidence-based statements rated on the RAND/UCLA 1–9 appropriateness scale by an international panel of experts.
Anonymous Voting
Votes are stored by token for completion tracking, while names and emails remain outside the analysis exports. Final reporting uses aggregate results.
Publication-Ready Output
Automatic generation of figures, tables, and exports in journal-ready formats.
Voting Scale
Panelists rate each statement on a 1–9 scale:
1–3
Inappropriate
4–6
Uncertain
7–9
Appropriate